Thursday, 4 June 2026

Australia's greenhouse gas emissions drop as renewable energy, batteries surge - 5th June 2026

 Australia's greenhouse gas emissions have dropped, showing signs of a turning point in the country's most polluting sectors.

Emissions are at their lowest point since the COVID pandemic shut down the economy, dropping 2.1 per cent over the year to December 2025, according to the latest national greenhouse gas inventory update.

The significant drop is largely driven by clean energy replacing fossil fuels in electricity generation, but transport emissions also continued to fall, year-on-year, for the second quarter in a row since the pandemic.

That drop doesn't yet account for the surging demand for electric vehicles (EVs) since the start of the year.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-05/australias-emissions-drop-as-renewable-energy-batteries-surge/106751294

The Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries reported EV sales have doubled in the past year, hitting a record high of 20 per cent of new car sales in May.

That figure more than doubles again if you include hybrid and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, with the share of all electrified vehicle sales hitting 46 per cent.






Wednesday, 26 November 2025

Government projected to badly miss 2035 climate target, fall shy of 2030 (27th November 2025)

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-27/climate-target-2035-badly-miss-projection/106059034

Australia is projected to fall just shy of its 2030 climate target and badly miss its 2035 target without significant changes, the climate change minister has revealed.

Delivering an annual climate statement to parliament, Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen said it was normal "for there to be a gap between projected emissions and a target 10 years in the future".

"As new policies are developed and implemented, the emissions outlook improves. That's what a target is for — to drive new initiatives and work," Mr Bowen said.

The Environment Department says Australia is on track to reach a 42 per cent reduction in emissions by the end of this decade, 1 per cent short of the legislated target.

But the department has warned in its annual statement that the country is far further behind on meeting the government's recently decided commitment to cut emissions by 62 to 70 per cent by 2035.

It says on current projections, emissions will fall by just 48 per cent instead.

While the government will fall short of its headline 2030 goal, it is still expected to meet its international obligations for this decade, as it will remain within the cumulative carbon emissions budget set under the Paris Agreement.

Chris Bowen has delivered the annual climate statement from the Climate Change Authority. (ABC News: Matt Roberts)



Thursday, 18 September 2025

Australia's 2035 climate targets on path to net zero judged by the experts - 18th Sept 2025

 

Australia's 2035 climate targets on path to net zero judged by the experts


After much anticipation, Australia has set its new climate targets: a reduction of 62 to 70 per cent within the next 10 years.

Climate groups have already criticised the targets as "timid, weak, and a failure".

Under the Paris Agreement, countries have to submit increasingly ambitious targets every five years with the goal of keeping warming below 1.5 degrees.

The United Kingdom's target is 81 per cent by 2035 from 1990 levels.

Professor Frank Jotzo, head of the Centre for Climate and Energy Policy at ANU, is more focused on the policy settings and regulations the Australian Government will need to apply to bring emissions down.

"A target in the 60 per cent range… is not a disappointment in terms of lack of ambition," he said. (re Australia)

"Achieving 65 per cent emission reduction by 2035 would mean halving emissions levels between now, 2025, and 2035. 

"So that would be an enormous transformation of aspects of Australia's greenhouse gas-emitting sectors."

Even at 62 per cent, the floor of the newly-announced targets, Australia will need to work much harder because most of our emissions reductions so far have come from changes in the natural world, as opposed to cutting back on fossil fuels.  

Between 2005 and March 2025, Australia's emissions decreased by 28 percent.

However, when you remove the land use sector, emissions have only dipped by a small 4 per cent.

How much do Australia's actions matter?

There will also be much conversation about whether Australia can have a tangible impact on the world's progress towards net zero.

Australia accounts for around 1 per cent of global emissions, but is also one of the world's top fossil fuel exporters. When those emissions are quantified, it rises to 4 per cent.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen  hand down a 2035 target more ambitious than Australia's Canadian or New Zealand allies, but below the United Kingdom's, which is one of the most ambitious in the world.

The next major climate commitment, one of the most significant decisions Labor will make this term, will strike a middle path between like-minded nations.

It is expected to be committed in a meeting of cabinet today, before being taken to New York next week, where other world leaders will also gather to confirm their 2035 targets at a meeting of the United Nations General Assembly.

The commitment follows the release of the first National Climate Risk Assessment on Monday.

That report warned 1.5 million people could be affected by sea levels rising by 2050, an increase in heat deaths and frequent flooding in major cities if global warming rises above 2 degrees Celsius.




Monday, 15 September 2025

Australia's emission targets as of March 2025


The current legislated interim target is 43 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030 (on the way to net zero by 2050).

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-15/albanese-government-2035-climate-emissions-target/105771566

 In the year to March this year 2025, Australia's emissions totalled 440 million tonnes — 28 per cent less than in 2005.

On the current trajectory, emissions will be about 36 per cent lower than 2005 by 2030, 43 per cent lower by 2035, and 86 per cent lower by 2050 (not 100 per cent as legislated).

The Climate Change Authority (CCA) in its draft consultation, in which it decreed that 65-75 per cent below 2005 levels was achievable.

At the risk of over-simplifying and pre-empting the CCA's sophisticated, detailed modelling: 65 per cent or less means no carbon tax, 75 per cent or more means carbon tax.

First, Australia's wealth rests to a large extent on fossil fuel exports and the government keeps approving new fossil fuel projects, including last Friday's approval of Woodside's massive North West Shelf gas project.

And second,
many farmers are very unhappy about new transmission lines and wind turbines going on or near their land,
which are needed because wind and solar farms are not going where the old coal-fired power stations are.

The approval for the Woodside project is conditional on the North West Shelf operations becoming net zero by 2050, which will mean a huge extra demand for carbon offsets, or Australian Carbon Credit Units.

In fact, if the government announces an ambitious 2035 target this week while maintaining and expanding the nation's fossil fuel infrastructure, the only way there will be enough offsets to achieve it will be if there's also a carbon tax to pay for them.

Economist Ross Garnaut and public policy expert Rod Sims, founders of renewable energy think tank The Superpower Institute, have suggested that a carbon tax be applied to exports as well as domestic use, but Friday's approval of the Woodside project makes it clear that won't happen.

As for the full electrification of the electricity grid needed to achieve net zero by 2050, it will likely either have to be done despite protesting farmers, or through the near-universal adoption of household and business rooftop solar with batteries … or with nuclear power.

Sunday, 1 June 2025

Bowen open to carbon tariff, says Australia must 'do more' to hit 2030 climate target but remains on track - 1st June 2025

 


INSIDERS INTERVIEW WITH ENERGY MINISTER CHRIS BOWN

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-01/bowen-open-to-carbon-tariff/105362978

In short: 

Energy Minister Chris Bowen says Australia is "by and large" on track to hit its 2030 emissions goal but concedes the need to "do more", leaving the door open to a carbon tariff on cement and other products pending an expert review.

Mr Bowen said the newly approved North West Shelf expansion would not jeopardise emissions goals because the site was covered by the safeguard mechanism and legally required to ratchet down its own emissions toward net zero.

What's next?

The government will soon decide its 2035 target, subject to the advice of the independent Climate Change Authority, and is bidding to host the next global climate conference. 

Mr Bowen said Australia was "by and large on track" to meet its legislated target of reducing emissions by 43 per cent by 2030, despite new figures this week showing flatlining progress in 2024.

Labor approved a 40-year expanded licence to Australia's largest oil and gas project, Western Australia's North West Shelf, in a move criticised by environmental groups.

Mr Bowen said the decision by Environment Minister Murray Watt was made according to the "very strict criteria of the environmental approvals legislation", which does not allow consideration of emissions impacts and which Labor has so far failed to reform. 

Friday, 30 May 2025

Australia just approved Woodside's gas project until 2070. How could it happen? 31st May 2025

 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-31/woodside-north-west-shelf-approval-did-not-consider-climate/105347716

The Australian government's decision to increase gas mining in WA for the next 45 years did not consider cultural and environmental impact, global warming and climate change.

"Suddenly, a project which is now allowed to go ahead until 2070, it's going to ring alarm bells in a very, very, very big way."


Some weeks more than others, climate change really bears down on Australians.

This week, the news carried images of eerie orange skies as dust storms whipped across landscapes dried from record-breaking droughts. Further north, homes were submerged in floods exacerbated by heavier rain from a warmer climate.

And also this week, the Australian government approved the extension of one of the world's largest gas facilities until 2070.

But this decision isn't about climate change.

At least not under Australia's current laws, where the climate harm from fossil fuel projects doesn't have to be considered.

How can Australia approve a fossil fuel mega-project that will run until 20 years after the world is meant to reach net zero emissions?

"I think the average punter out there is basically saying, 'Hang on, this is about climate change and 2070, what are we doing? What in the hell are we doing?'" lamented Greg Bourne from the Climate Council.

The North West Shelf is already Australia's third-highest emitting facility in the country, producing about 6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas each year.

That's just the direct emissions from extracting and processing the gas and doesn't count emissions after the gas is sold, shipped, and burnt at its final destination.

Some estimates put the total lifetime emissions from this project at the equivalent of a decade of Australia's current emissions.

A decade. Think of it as pushing out Australia's climate goals by another 10 years.

It's not just climate experts warning that the world needs to stop expanding fossil fuels: the International Energy Agency says there is enough existing coal, oil, and gas projects to supply the world and stay the course to net zero.

"The world is awash in gas, primarily coming out from the Middle East, but lots coming out from America and so on like that. I think our Australian companies fool themselves into thinking that they're going to be the last company standing, pushing gas out there,"

"Climate change is one of the most significant challenges facing the global community and one of the greatest threats to Australia's way of life.

"It is time to act. It is time for procrastination to end … We cannot any longer afford to be complacent on this issue."



Woodside's North West Shelf approval just a stepping stone to enable Browse project - 27th May 2025

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-29/woodside-nw-shelf-approval-to-enable-browse-basin-development-/105344468

When all the hype and the fury is stripped away, the decision to extend the life of the gigantic North West Shelf gas plant boils down to one thing.

"It's really all about Browse," says RISC Advisory boss Martin Wilkes in relation to the huge gas field off the Kimberley coast of Western Australia.

Browse is one of the country's biggest untapped resources projects, with gas reserves large enough to meet the equivalent of Australia's entire domestic demand for almost 20 years.

To the Western Australian government and the state's industry, it represents energy security, jobs and billions of dollars of investment.

And for some of the world's biggest oil and gas companies — not to mention Australia's flag-bearer, Woodside — Browse presents as the last great hurrah for the country's gas export industry.


Browse is likely to be the mother-of-all environmental fights — a pivotal clash between those seeking an end to new fossil fuel mega-project and those in the opposite corner.

 Climate groups have labelled Browse a "carbon bomb", claiming the project could lead to emissions of up to 1.6 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent over its lifetime — an amount three times Australia's annual pollution output.

 

By piping Browse gas 900 kilometres south and processing it through the North West Shelf, he says Woodside would avoid the need for a new LNG plant that would come at huge cost.




 

Thursday, 15 May 2025

Broome to get big solar farm and six hour battery to replace gas and diesel contract - 16th May 2025

 The remote pearling and tourism town of Broome – in the northwest of Western Australia – is to have its current supply of fossil fuel generation largely replaced by a large solar farm and six-hour big battery, under proposals unveiled by the state-owned Horizon power.
The plans include a 90 megawatt (MW) solar farm, supported by a 42 MW, 239 MWh battery, and associated network infrastructure.
It is designed to replace the current power contract that relies on gas and diesel for the town of 15,000 people, more than 2,000 kms north of Perth. It says the new renewable based system will be cheaper, cleaner, more reliable and offer more economic opportunities.  (source: 
https://reneweconomy.com.au/)




The details of the proposal – first flagged several years ago – are revealed in an application to the state Environmental Protection Agency, and while not the first remote town to feature solar and a big battery, it appears to be one of the biggest of its type in Australia, if not the biggest.

Horizon Power says the Future Energy System (FES) in Broome will ensure security of energy supply to Broome after the expiry of the existing power purchase agreement, and will result in higher renewables and a reduction in one million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over the assumed 20-year lifetime of the project.

Wind energy had been considered, but Horizon says it was rejected because the wind resource was not considered strong, and because of the risk of cyclones.

It also cited the remoteness – high maintenance, logistics, supply issues – higher capital cost compared to solar, and environmental impacts to aerial fauna and the challenge of obtaining environmental and regulatory approvals.

The new solar and battery facility will replace the contract with the existing Broome power station, owned by EDL, which includes 17 small gas generators, and nine back-up diesel generators, with a total of 42 MW. There are more than two dozen different generators because of the varying consumer patterns, and the need for back-up.

Horizon says extending the gas and diesel contract would risk high supply costs, reduced reliability (because of fuel supply chain disruptions), and higher emissions, as well as missed economic opportunities in a renewable transition.

The Broome Clean Energy Report, commissioned by Environs Kimberley and produced by Sustainable Energy Now in 2023, estimated that more than 80 per cent of Broome’s electricity generation could be achieved with renewable energy at three quarters of the price of gas-fired generation.

“Many towns in the Kimberley are powered by high emission fossil fuels such as diesel and gas. In Broome, Horizon Power currently purchases power from an independent power producer,” the application says.

“The power purchase agreement (PPA) is due to expire, providing Horizon Power with an opportunity to integrate gridscale renewable electricity into the town supply.”

It says the final design of the project may change before a final investment decision is made.


The proposals includes a 16 kms transmission line, either underground or overhead, that will follow Broome Cape Leveque Road, Broome Highway, Old Broome Road and Fredrick Street to connect the solar PV and BESS to the existing substation on Fredrick Street in Broome.

Friday, 18 October 2024

Gas industry in damage control as landmark study finds LNG 'worse than coal' for the climate 19th Oct 2024

 

Gas industry in damage control as landmark study finds LNG 'worse than coal' for the climate


In January this year, seemingly out of nowhere, US President Joe Biden made a decision that sent shock waves through the trillion-dollar global gas industry.

With the stroke of a pen, Mr Biden put a pause on approvals for any new project looking to ship super-chilled liquefied natural gas — or LNG — from US shores.

It was a decision that left many in the industry floored.

After all, within just a few short years America had rocketed from a position of having no LNG industry to being one of the world's biggest exporters of the fuel alongside Australia and Qatar.

And it was a decision that has set off a political firestorm in the US, where energy and America's insatiable needs for it are looming, as ever, as a critical issue in an election year.

Underlying that decision, however, was a landmark report that has cast fresh doubt over the supposed environmental benefits of gas compared with coal.

Gas emissions 'worse than coal'

It's a study that has raised fresh questions over the role of gas as a bridge to a renewable energy future.

The peer-reviewed study by Robert Howarth, a professor at Cornell University, found American LNG, at least, was worse than coal when it came to emissions.

Specifically, the report found greenhouse gas emissions from LNG were 33 per cent greater than those related to coal when measured over a 20-year timeline.

And at the heart of Professor Howarth's finding was not carbon but, rather, methane, a far more potent greenhouse gas.



Tuesday, 2 July 2024

When it comes to power, solar could leave nuclear and everything else in the shade

 

When it comes to power, solar could leave nuclear and everything else in the shade https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-07-03/energy-power-solar-leave-nuclear-in-the-shade/104049276

Whereas nuclear power is barely growing, and is shrinking as a proportion of global power output, The Economist reported solar power was growing so quickly it was set to become the biggest source of electricity on the planet by the mid-2030s.
By the 2040s — within this next generation — it could be the world's largest source of energy of any kind, overtaking fossil fuels like coal and oil.



Thursday, 21 March 2024

23rd March 2023 - "Can a country run entirely on renewable energy"?

 

Can a country run entirely on renewable energy?


Businessman Dick Smith has thrown his support behind calls to introduce nuclear-generated power to Australia, rejecting renewable-led electricity generation in the process.

Appearing on Sydney radio station 2GB earlier this week, Mr Smith said Australia "should be making a decision to go nuclear now", pouring cold water on suggestions that wind and solar — and renewables more generally — could instead lead the nation's energy transition.

"Look, I can tell you, this claim by the CSIRO that you can run a whole country on solar and wind is simply a lie," Mr Smith said.

"It is not true. They are telling lies. No country has ever been able to run entirely on renewables — that's impossible."

But experts consulted by RMIT ABC Fact Check suggested Mr Smith's statement doesn't hold up.

Mark Diesendorf, an expert on sustainable energy and energy policy from the University of New South Wales, labelled Mr Smith's assertions as "incorrect".

"Several countries (and Tasmania) already run their electricity systems on 100 per cent renewables," he said in an email, noting that such places relied heavily on hydro power.

Even when focusing on wind and solar-generated power alone, experts rejected Mr Smith's claim that it would be "impossible" for it to power an entire country.

Andrew Blakers, a professor of engineering at the Australian National University's Institute for Climate, Energy and Disaster solutions, told Fact Check: 

"Several detailed studies show that [getting to] 100 per cent renewables based mostly on solar and wind is quite straightforward, provided that enough transmission and storage is built."

Professor Blakers pointed to studies conducted by his research group investigating the feasibility of 100 per cent renewables in a number of countries, including Australia.

"[Solar] and wind [would] allow Australia to reach 100 per cent renewable electricity rapidly at low cost," concluded one such study, co-authored by Professor Blakers and published in 2017.

As for the countries putting renewable power to the test, Mark Z. Jacobson, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University in the US, and director of its Atmosphere/Energy Program, pointed Fact Check to a detailed list of countries at or near the 100 per cent renewable energy mark.

"There are four countries running on 100 per cent wind-water-solar (WWS) alone for their grid electricity," he said in an email, noting that a further three countries relied on WWS for 99.78 per cent to 99.99 per cent of their electricity generation, while 45 countries were above 50 per cent.

According to a document produced and supplied by Professor Jacobson, the four countries running on 100 per cent WWS in 2021 were Albania, Bhutan, Nepal and Paraguay.

When it came to regions with a comparable or greater population size to that of Australia, Professor Jacobson pointed to the US state of California, which has a population of around 39 million.

As of Tuesday this week, he said, the state, which is aiming for 100 per cent carbon-free electricity by 2045, had "been running on more than 100 per cent WWS for 10 out of the last 11 days for between 0.25 and 6 hours per day".

While it is not entirely clear what Mr Smith was referring to when he suggested the CSIRO had claimed Australia could run entirely on wind and solar, the national science agency's latest annual GenCost report, released in July 2023, found that wind and solar remained the cheapest form of new-build electricity generation.

An updated draft of the report, released last month after factoring in feedback related to integration costs prior to 2030, also found renewables to be the cheapest form of new-build energy.

The Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) has forecast that renewables will be able to meet the entire demand of the national electricity market (NEM) by 2025, albeit for short periods of time (for example, 30 minutes).

Introducing AEMO's 2022 Engineering Roadmap to 100 per cent Renewables, CEO Daniel Westermen wrote that "the power system will require additional engineering solutions to provide essential system services to maintain a stable electrical voltage and frequency and ensure a secure state of operation".

"Proven technologies such as synchronous condensers will play a role, alongside newer technologies such as grid-forming inverters. The human dimensions of this transition are as important as the technical requirements."

In addition, a 2021 report from the Grattan Institute noted that "getting to 100 per cent renewable energy [in Australia] over the next two decades would be expensive unless there are major technological advances to backup renewable supply through rare winter wind droughts".

"That's why Australia should commit only to net zero emissions in the NEM by the 2040s, not absolute zero emissions or 100 per cent renewable energy."

As the institute's James Ha explained at the time, net zero emissions doesn't "require that all electricity people use within the jurisdiction come from renewable sources".

"Some might come from coal or gas-fired generation, but the government offsets this amount by making or buying an equivalent amount of renewable electricity."





FRACKING FACTS

2020 Fracking Facts